Recently I had a very interesting experience which to me highlights the anomalies of allowing EFT - Emotional Freedom Techniques - to be used by the inexperienced and (more dangerous in my opinion) the 'not professionally trained' practitioner.
I work from my home - a SoHo business - and have separate private and business telephone numbers - these telephone systems are superb nowadays.
So let me set the scene, imagine a Sunday evening, having been out and had a relaxing time, pleasant company and conversation, also had a drink - coming back my business line showed 4 telephone messages had been left. Nothing new in that, that's why businesses have answerphone machines! However this was on a weekend evening and the first was left at 9.23pm and the last one (which I caught as I was retiring to bed) at 11.21pm. Each message progressed with a little more information - so by the 4th message I knew her name, telephone contact number and that she wanted EFT.
On the last call, as I mentioned, I picked it up. The person was breathless and was rambling on '60 to the dozen' as we say. I explained that "Yes I do offer EFT however I wouldn't be able to talk to her until the next morning after 9.00am as it was out of hours and it was very very late, so could she please ring back". She accepted this - I was not going to begin a discussion over the telephone after going out, relaxing and also have had an alcoholic drink - this was not the time nor place - I have strict boundaries. The reason I answered the phone was that I was passing it on my way to closing the door (I have an office and practice room at my home) and it happened to ring, so I automatically picked it up.
The person in question rang me at 8.29am the next morning (mmm - not very good at listening). I was busy and not in the office until 9.00am - as I explained to her the previous night. At 9.00am I sat down at my desk in my office, and at 9.03am she rang.
The conversation went something like this:
Caller: Hi I rang yesterday. Do you do EFT?
Me:Yes as I mentioned last night when I spoke to you.
Caller: I want to come and see you today for some EFT
Me: I may be able to fit you in for a free initial consultation to talk about your problem however can you tell me a bit about yourself first?
Caller: Well I have personality issues, I get detached and distanced in certian situations, I was abused at 2yrs old, I was abused some time ago and don't remember it and I was told EFT can take you back into a trauma without you knowing what it is and release it - so I need some EFT.
Me: Well tell me more about yourself first. Who you've seen about this problem? You mention personality disorders and abuse, have you seen your doctor or a psychologist or psychiatrist about it? Have you seen anyone else?
Caller: Yes, I see my psychologist monthly. I went to see Xxxxx locally (someone I had never heard of before so presumably a new EFT practitioner on the block) about it and she uses EFT and she said EFT could release the trauma for me in one session but she couldn't help me because I need to see a psychologist who uses EFT and she's not a psychologist.
Me: Well I'm not a psychologist like the one you'd see on the NHS, I am a psychotherapist and energy psychologist which is different. Does your NHS psychologist use EFT?
Caller: No.
Me: Ok - before I offer you any sessions, I offer an initial Free Consultation where we meet and discuss your problems. You say are currently seeing an NHS psychologist so I would need a letter from them to say that they would agree to me helping you with EFT. So I won't be able to start working with you using EFT or anything else UNTIL I have an ok, in writing, from your NHS psychologist. That's the way I work, if anyone is undergoing treatment of any kind, or has been over the last 5years, from an NHS psychiatrist, psychologist or CPN (Community Psychiatric Nurse) then I need their acknowledgement in writing. I will not tread on anyone's toes or go against whatever treatment they are using with you.
Caller: So you need to speak with them?
Me: No that's not necessary. I don't need to talk to them, I need to have a letter from them AFTER we have had out free Initial Consultation. That's the ethical and professional guidelines I work within. Do you want to come and see me today to discuss your situation?
Caller: No - I want to get rid of this problem, these voices, these personalites, this abuse I just want to get rid of it and she said EFT could do it because it works in a minute.
Me: Well EFT may be able to help you get rid of it, I don't know until we try it. However I do know that with personality disorders it takes more than one session and it may take many sessions. Unfortunately if you have been told that EFT is a 'One Minute Wonder' then it doesn't work like that with complex issues, which is what it sounds as though you have.
Caller: Ok then you can't get rid of it for me today?
Me: You called my number several times last night, late in the evening, so can you tell me what had happened to make your contacting me so urgent?
Caller: I decided I wanted to deal with this problem.
Me: So you contacted me last night after deciding you wanted to get rid of this problem and you only want to use EFT for it?
Caller: Yes because I want it to go in a minute.
Me: Well I can see you today but only for the free initial consultation, I can't give you any sessions until I receive a letter from your NHS psychologist. I need to have the ok from your Psychologist BEFORE we have any sessions.
Caller: Ok then - bye.
What concerns me about this is that EFT is 'being promoted' as a wonder-technique that can work wonders in 'One Minute' - which may happen, on occasions with simple problems - but not VERY VERY often. With more severe and complex problems such as dis-associative disorder, schizophrenia, multiple-personality disorder, long-term abuse, long-term anxiety problems, social phobias and depressions - then the numbers of sessions are many, with some people having as many as 10-20 sessions, yet all the client hears is 'One Minute Wonder EFT'.
Many people are attracted to EFT because of its simplicity, ease of use and lack of qualifications needed to practice it - so ALL they hear, see and experience are the words, image and feelings that SHOUT out at them "Wow! I can be free of xyz in a minute!"
This is great and maybe it can help them, however let us remember when Prozac was released on the market several years ago as the 'Wonder-drug'. For some it worked, for others it didn't do anything, for others it made them worse, andn it was being presecribed for almost everything. EFT is in my opinion a good tool or technique that is good for some issues, problems or situations and not so good for others - where other tools or techniques may be of better use.
So in my opinion what should be included in professional EFT trainings given to practitioners/therapists who intend to become EFT practitioners - or simply who wish to use EFT as a tool in their toolkit - is a recognition that 'One Minute Wonders' do happen yet very very seldom, AND they are NEVER EVER 'One Minute' ONLY but several or 10 or 15 or 30. And if one IS therefore going to advertise (or tell potential clients about) this 'One Minute Wonder' , then there also ought to be an additional collar phrase included "EFT can be a ... in certain situations".
I consider it ethical and professional to point out to intending EFT practitioners on my trainings and also to clients that "whilst EFT CAN work very quickly with some issues, it doesn't always work in such a quick manner with everything." I wonder why it is so difficult to include this in trainings instead of promoting EFT as a 'One Minute Wonder' - after all some problems have taken years to develop and they have supporting structures which keep them in place for whatever reason. Can we simply withdraw that support without any consequences? I think not - no matter HOW painful the problem might be.
Hozho
Christina Elvin