Hi There
The revelations unearthed recently regarding the 'New of The World' phone hacking and its consequential eruptions appears to have culminated very recently (Sun 17th July) in the resignation of Sir Paul Stephenson, the Met Police Commissioner - due, we are informed, over a FREE stay at Champneys. Champneys hired Neil Wallace (former NoTH deputy editor) as a PR Consultant - the Met had hired him too as a PR Consultant. Now this brought to mind the phrase 'There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch'.
I remember many years ago - in the late 1990s when I was a volunteer committee member at a health-related voluntary organisation - which was eventually closed down to make way for 'newer organisational changes involving the NHS' - we had to declare anything that we received from 'outside' organisations or agencies as they were seen as 'gifts'. Even down to Christmas boxes of chocolates. And we did this by signing an agreement which was called, if memory serves me correctly, an 'Ethics Statement'. I seem to remember this had to be renewed and signed every year. And this was in a voluntary organisation.
Now, being in the complementary therapy field I readily recognise and abide by the ruling that everything is an 'exchange of energy'. And to me this means that there's no such thing as a 'Free Lunch' or 'Free Meal' or anything given 'Freely'. I 'give' something to someone and not charge money for it in order to receive something back - but not in a selfish way and this is because I believe in this 'exchange of energy' and also I believe in 'for the greater good'.
So let's peek at what 'exchange of energy' could comprise. Charging people (clients) money for sessions of therapy can be a big obstacle that many therapists and practitioners have - because they enjoy 'helping others' and using their 'tools in trade' be it EFT, meridian & energy therapies, aromatherapy, reflexology, hypnotherapy, counselling, tarot or whatever - they feel very uncomfortable about charging money for something they enjoy doing - until they understand that this 'charging' is really an 'exchange of energy.' And that 'exchange' can be done in very many ways. So 'charging is one way.
Or that 'exchange' could be helping someone move on with their life, recognising that they they may in turn help someone else - helping to set up a 'help' chain; or it could be that in the distant future the therapist may receive a contact from someone who knew this person; or even just a simple smile at someone and seeing them smile back is payment enough - something as simple as a smile can change our outlook on things; and even 'swapping therapies' is a good 'exchange'.
Thus to receive a 'FREE' stay at an expensive venue could show naivety to say the least in my opinion. And I therfore find myself asking the question "Can we expect such naivety from someone in such a highly respected and powerful position?" Well, he is human after all, and could therefore possibly be classed as naive in some aspects of life - especially if he doesn't know or understand or appreciate this 'exchange of energy'.
So, in my opinion and experience, recognising that an 'exchange of energy' takes place is all important, very important.
Maybe you understand where others don't ...
All the best
Christina